Search

Criminal Defense

Balancing the Factors in the Bolin Murder

January 23, 2024

Illinois law allows judges discretion in sentencing, considering evidence, aggravating circumstances, and age, as seen in varied sentences for a 2021 murder.

Key Takeaways

  • Illinois law grants judges discretion in sentencing, considering trial evidence, aggravating circumstances, and the defendant's age.
  • Sentence variation in the Bolin murder case (30 to 66 years) reflects judicial consideration of individual roles and circumstances.
  • The case exemplifies Illinois law's approach to tailor sentences in serious crimes, aiming for justice and rehabilitation.

"All penalties shall be determined both according to the seriousness of the offense and with the object of restoring the offender to useful citizenship." 

The Illinois Constitution Article I, Section 11 (1970) 

 

A Tazewell County Circuit Court has now sentenced four people to prison time for the October 2021 attack on Rebecca Bolin and Douglas Bolin in Mackinaw, Illinois. The attack left Rebecca Bolin dead and Douglas Bolin injured. Prosecutors have said that Dahlia Bolin, only 15 at the time of the murder, had orchestrated a murder-for-hire scheme with others for the purpose of murdering her father, Douglas Bolin, including offering to split life insurance proceeds as part of the incentive.  

 

All four pled guilty to first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, and conspiracy, with Dahlia Bolin also pleading guilty to solicitation of first-degree murder for hire. However, the sentences of the perpetrators vary.   

  • Dhalia Bolin – 60 years 
  • Nathaniel Maloney – 66 years 
  • Andrew Street – 55 years 
  • Sage Raeuber – 30 years.  

The differences are stark – a total of 36 years from highest to lowest. However, some digging into Illinois law goes to show why this is the case.  

 

Sentencing for crimes in Illinois is based on State law, specifically a few portions of the Illinois Unified Code of Corrections. For first-degree murder, the term of imprisonment is to be "not less than 20 years and not more than 60 years." That is a large range – for the average life expectancy in Illinois of around 77 years, a 60-year sentence is very likely essentially a life sentence, but a 20-year sentence could mean release in middle age. (Remember, each crime has its own sentencing length, so if you are convicted of three serious crimes at once, those times can stack into the hundreds of years.) 

 

The ranges give judges broad discretion to decide how long sentences should be. Things judges can consider include:  

  • Evidence from the trial,  
  • Pre sentencing reports,  
  • The financial burden on the State for incarceration,  
  • Aggravating circumstances, i.e., extreme violence, etc.,  
  • Plea deals, and other factors. 

 

What matters, however, is that "all sentences shall be imposed by the judge based upon his independent assessment of the elements." That is to say, the Judge is the decision maker, and as long as they stay within the year range provided by the statute, there is a good chance that any sentence will be upheld.  

 

In the murder of Rebecca Bolin and the attempted murder of Douglas Bolin (each offense with its own sentencing range), there are many elements that one might consider an aggravating circumstance. This likely explains long sentences for the relatively young people involved in the crimes.  

  • Dhalia Bolin – 17 years old 
  • Nathaniel Maloney  - 20 years old 
  • Andrew Street – 19 years old 
  • Sage Raeuber – 21 years old.  

(This was their respective ages at the time of sentencing; Dahlia was around 15 years old at the time of the crime).  

 

However, one can likely see the result of how judges consider the factors of a crime in sentencing in the time to be served by Sage Raeuber. According to prosecutors, she was the get-away driver and did not participate in the actual attacks. Her sentence is much shorter than the others.  

 

Even in the wake of tragedies such as this, it is important to understand the laws which govern our lives as citizens. Illinois law allows judges broad discretion in sentencing, considering factors like evidence, aggravating circumstances, and the defendant's age. The varying sentences highlight the complex interplay of legal factors in delivering justice. 

Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Each individual's legal needs are unique, and these materials may not be applicable to your legal situation. Always seek the advice of a competent attorney with any questions you may have regarding a legal issue. Do not disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this blog.
 in 
Text Link
 category

Contributors

Written by
Kevin O'Flaherty
Factchecked by
Sign up to our newsletter
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Local Law

Balancing the Factors in the Bolin Murder

Kevin O'Flaherty
January 23, 2024

Key Takeaways

  • Illinois law grants judges discretion in sentencing, considering trial evidence, aggravating circumstances, and the defendant's age.
  • Sentence variation in the Bolin murder case (30 to 66 years) reflects judicial consideration of individual roles and circumstances.
  • The case exemplifies Illinois law's approach to tailor sentences in serious crimes, aiming for justice and rehabilitation.

"All penalties shall be determined both according to the seriousness of the offense and with the object of restoring the offender to useful citizenship." 

The Illinois Constitution Article I, Section 11 (1970) 

 

A Tazewell County Circuit Court has now sentenced four people to prison time for the October 2021 attack on Rebecca Bolin and Douglas Bolin in Mackinaw, Illinois. The attack left Rebecca Bolin dead and Douglas Bolin injured. Prosecutors have said that Dahlia Bolin, only 15 at the time of the murder, had orchestrated a murder-for-hire scheme with others for the purpose of murdering her father, Douglas Bolin, including offering to split life insurance proceeds as part of the incentive.  

 

All four pled guilty to first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, and conspiracy, with Dahlia Bolin also pleading guilty to solicitation of first-degree murder for hire. However, the sentences of the perpetrators vary.   

  • Dhalia Bolin – 60 years 
  • Nathaniel Maloney – 66 years 
  • Andrew Street – 55 years 
  • Sage Raeuber – 30 years.  

The differences are stark – a total of 36 years from highest to lowest. However, some digging into Illinois law goes to show why this is the case.  

 

Sentencing for crimes in Illinois is based on State law, specifically a few portions of the Illinois Unified Code of Corrections. For first-degree murder, the term of imprisonment is to be "not less than 20 years and not more than 60 years." That is a large range – for the average life expectancy in Illinois of around 77 years, a 60-year sentence is very likely essentially a life sentence, but a 20-year sentence could mean release in middle age. (Remember, each crime has its own sentencing length, so if you are convicted of three serious crimes at once, those times can stack into the hundreds of years.) 

 

The ranges give judges broad discretion to decide how long sentences should be. Things judges can consider include:  

  • Evidence from the trial,  
  • Pre sentencing reports,  
  • The financial burden on the State for incarceration,  
  • Aggravating circumstances, i.e., extreme violence, etc.,  
  • Plea deals, and other factors. 

 

What matters, however, is that "all sentences shall be imposed by the judge based upon his independent assessment of the elements." That is to say, the Judge is the decision maker, and as long as they stay within the year range provided by the statute, there is a good chance that any sentence will be upheld.  

 

In the murder of Rebecca Bolin and the attempted murder of Douglas Bolin (each offense with its own sentencing range), there are many elements that one might consider an aggravating circumstance. This likely explains long sentences for the relatively young people involved in the crimes.  

  • Dhalia Bolin – 17 years old 
  • Nathaniel Maloney  - 20 years old 
  • Andrew Street – 19 years old 
  • Sage Raeuber – 21 years old.  

(This was their respective ages at the time of sentencing; Dahlia was around 15 years old at the time of the crime).  

 

However, one can likely see the result of how judges consider the factors of a crime in sentencing in the time to be served by Sage Raeuber. According to prosecutors, she was the get-away driver and did not participate in the actual attacks. Her sentence is much shorter than the others.  

 

Even in the wake of tragedies such as this, it is important to understand the laws which govern our lives as citizens. Illinois law allows judges broad discretion in sentencing, considering factors like evidence, aggravating circumstances, and the defendant's age. The varying sentences highlight the complex interplay of legal factors in delivering justice. 

Article by
Kevin O'Flaherty
Factchecked by
Schedule a Consultation
Expertise Best Child Support Lawyers in Chicago 201710 Best 2016 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Law AttorneysAvvo Clients' Choice 2016 DivorceRising Stars Kevin P. O'Flaherty SuperLawyers.com10 Best Law Firms 2018 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Legal Counsel Attorneys Estate Planning Law40 under forty

Contact Us

Please contact our friendly lawyers to Schedule a Consultation.

See below for our other locations. If our office locations are not convenient for you, we are happy to speak with you by phone.

We're here to help!
Email
Info@Oflaherty-Law.com
Phone
(630) 324-6666

What to Expect From a Consultation

The purpose of a  consultation is to determine whether our firm is a good fit for your legal needs. Although we often discuss expected results and costs, our attorneys do not give legal advice unless and until you choose to retain us. Consultations may carry a charge, depending on the facts of the matter and the area of law. The cost of your consultation, if any, is communicated to you by our intake team or the attorney.

Hours of Operation

Monday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Tuesday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Wednesday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Thursday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Friday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Saturday
Closed
Sunday
Closed

Our Service Areas

Illinois

O'Flaherty Law Of Arlington Heights
Learn About Our Remote Law Approach

Meet the Owner

I am personally committed to ensuring that each one of our clients receives the highest level of client service from our team.  Our mission is to provide excellent legal work in a cost-effective manner while maintaining open lines of communication between our clients and their attorneys.  Many of our clients are going through difficult times in their lives when they reach out to us.  They should feel comfortable leaning on the experience and knowledge of our attorneys as their counselors and advocates.  We are here to help!

- Attorney Kevin O'Flaherty, Owner