Search

Civil Litigation

A Look into the JET Case and Illinois Environmental Law

May 8, 2024

environmental law book and gavel

IL Attorney General sues JET for environmental violations at its Sauget facility, demands cleanup.

Key Takeaways

  • The Illinois Attorney General's lawsuit against JET Enterprises highlights critical environmental risks due to improper chemical storage and illegal waste dumping, emphasizing the need for stringent regulatory enforcement.
  • The case underscores the role of state agencies and the Attorney General in protecting public health and the environment by demanding remedial actions and ongoing oversight to prevent future violations.
  • Collaborative efforts between state attorneys general and federal entities are vital for advocating stronger environmental protections and addressing systemic issues like those seen in the JET case.
  • In recent news, the Illinois Attorney General's office has filed a lawsuit against JET Enterprises & Holding Company LLC (JET), alleging several violations related to the improper storage of hazardous chemicals, illegal dumping of metal and chemical waste, and contamination of standing water at their facility in Sauget, Illinois. This case highlights the importance of enforcing environmental regulations to safeguard public health and the environment and the ensuing complexity that can follow.  

    Background of the JET Case 

    The lawsuit, filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court, accuses JET of negligent operations that have failed to prevent releasing hazardous waste into the environment. The facility, which has a long history dating back to 1929 as a zinc refining facility, has undergone various operations over the years, including construction of additional plants and cooling towers. Despite changes in ownership, the facility remained operational as a zinc refining facility until 2005, when it came under the ownership of JET. 

    Allegations and Legal Actions 

    The Attorney General's office alleges that JET's improper storage practices and illegal dumping have posed significant risks to the environment and the health of nearby residents. The lawsuit seeks to compel JET to engage a qualified environmental consultant to assess the extent of contamination at the site and to undertake necessary remedial actions under the oversight of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). 

    Furthermore, the lawsuit requests an immediate and preliminary injunction to address the ongoing environmental threats posed by JET's facility. These legal actions aim to hold JET accountable for its actions, ensure the cleanup of contamination, prevent further environmental harm, and provide additional environmental benefits to affected communities. 

    Enforcement of Illinois Environmental Law 

    The JET case is just one example of the Illinois Attorney General's efforts to enforce environmental laws and regulations in the state. The Attorney General's Environmental Enforcement Division plays a crucial role in civil environmental litigation, with over 25 attorneys working across Illinois to protect the environment. 

    State agencies, including the IEPA and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), are vital in referring environmental enforcement matters to the Attorney General's office. These referrals may involve violations of statutes aimed at protecting air, land, water, and natural resources. The Attorney General's office works closely with these agencies to investigate violations, file civil actions, and ensure compliance with environmental laws. 

    Collaborative Efforts and Advocacy 

    In addition to enforcing existing environmental laws, the Illinois Attorney General collaborates with other state attorneys general and governmental entities to advocate for effective federal environmental regulations. These efforts include opposing federal government and energy agencies' attempts to repeal or weaken regulations that protect air, land, water, and public health. 

    The Attorney General's office strives to uphold environmental protections and ensure the well-being of Illinois residents and ecosystems through litigation in federal courts and public comment submissions to regulatory agencies. 

    Conclusion 

    The JET case highlights the importance of enforcing environmental regulations to address environmental violations and protect public health and the environment. While it is critical that government agencies fiercely pursue the law, businesses are entitled to vigorous defense. Litigation watches will have to wait and see how the case proceeds.

    Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Each individual's legal needs are unique, and these materials may not be applicable to your legal situation. Always seek the advice of a competent attorney with any questions you may have regarding a legal issue. Do not disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this blog.
     in 
    Text Link
     category

    Contributors

    Written by
    Noah B. Dwyer
    Factchecked by
    Kevin O'Flaherty
    Sign up to our newsletter
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    Related Legal Topics

    No items found.
    Local Law

    A Look into the JET Case and Illinois Environmental Law

    Noah B. Dwyer
    May 8, 2024
    environmental law book and gavel

    Key Takeaways

  • The Illinois Attorney General's lawsuit against JET Enterprises highlights critical environmental risks due to improper chemical storage and illegal waste dumping, emphasizing the need for stringent regulatory enforcement.
  • The case underscores the role of state agencies and the Attorney General in protecting public health and the environment by demanding remedial actions and ongoing oversight to prevent future violations.
  • Collaborative efforts between state attorneys general and federal entities are vital for advocating stronger environmental protections and addressing systemic issues like those seen in the JET case.
  • In recent news, the Illinois Attorney General's office has filed a lawsuit against JET Enterprises & Holding Company LLC (JET), alleging several violations related to the improper storage of hazardous chemicals, illegal dumping of metal and chemical waste, and contamination of standing water at their facility in Sauget, Illinois. This case highlights the importance of enforcing environmental regulations to safeguard public health and the environment and the ensuing complexity that can follow.  

    Background of the JET Case 

    The lawsuit, filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court, accuses JET of negligent operations that have failed to prevent releasing hazardous waste into the environment. The facility, which has a long history dating back to 1929 as a zinc refining facility, has undergone various operations over the years, including construction of additional plants and cooling towers. Despite changes in ownership, the facility remained operational as a zinc refining facility until 2005, when it came under the ownership of JET. 

    Allegations and Legal Actions 

    The Attorney General's office alleges that JET's improper storage practices and illegal dumping have posed significant risks to the environment and the health of nearby residents. The lawsuit seeks to compel JET to engage a qualified environmental consultant to assess the extent of contamination at the site and to undertake necessary remedial actions under the oversight of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). 

    Furthermore, the lawsuit requests an immediate and preliminary injunction to address the ongoing environmental threats posed by JET's facility. These legal actions aim to hold JET accountable for its actions, ensure the cleanup of contamination, prevent further environmental harm, and provide additional environmental benefits to affected communities. 

    Enforcement of Illinois Environmental Law 

    The JET case is just one example of the Illinois Attorney General's efforts to enforce environmental laws and regulations in the state. The Attorney General's Environmental Enforcement Division plays a crucial role in civil environmental litigation, with over 25 attorneys working across Illinois to protect the environment. 

    State agencies, including the IEPA and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), are vital in referring environmental enforcement matters to the Attorney General's office. These referrals may involve violations of statutes aimed at protecting air, land, water, and natural resources. The Attorney General's office works closely with these agencies to investigate violations, file civil actions, and ensure compliance with environmental laws. 

    Collaborative Efforts and Advocacy 

    In addition to enforcing existing environmental laws, the Illinois Attorney General collaborates with other state attorneys general and governmental entities to advocate for effective federal environmental regulations. These efforts include opposing federal government and energy agencies' attempts to repeal or weaken regulations that protect air, land, water, and public health. 

    The Attorney General's office strives to uphold environmental protections and ensure the well-being of Illinois residents and ecosystems through litigation in federal courts and public comment submissions to regulatory agencies. 

    Conclusion 

    The JET case highlights the importance of enforcing environmental regulations to address environmental violations and protect public health and the environment. While it is critical that government agencies fiercely pursue the law, businesses are entitled to vigorous defense. Litigation watches will have to wait and see how the case proceeds.

    Article by
    Noah B. Dwyer
    Factchecked by
    Kevin O'Flaherty
    Schedule a Consultation
    Expertise Best Child Support Lawyers in Chicago 201710 Best 2016 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Law AttorneysAvvo Clients' Choice 2016 DivorceRising Stars Kevin P. O'Flaherty SuperLawyers.com10 Best Law Firms 2018 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Legal Counsel Attorneys Estate Planning Law40 under forty

    Contact Us

    Please contact our friendly lawyers to Schedule a Consultation.

    See below for our other locations. If our office locations are not convenient for you, we are happy to speak with you by phone.

    We're here to help!
    Email
    Info@Oflaherty-Law.com
    Phone
    (630) 324-6666

    What to Expect From a Consultation

    The purpose of a  consultation is to determine whether our firm is a good fit for your legal needs. Although we often discuss expected results and costs, our attorneys do not give legal advice unless and until you choose to retain us. Consultations may carry a charge, depending on the facts of the matter and the area of law. The cost of your consultation, if any, is communicated to you by our intake team or the attorney.

    Hours of Operation

    Monday
    9:00am - 6:00pm
    Tuesday
    9:00am - 6:00pm
    Wednesday
    9:00am - 6:00pm
    Thursday
    9:00am - 6:00pm
    Friday
    9:00am - 6:00pm
    Saturday
    Closed
    Sunday
    Closed

    Our Service Areas

    Illinois

    O'Flaherty Law Of Arlington Heights
    Learn About Our Remote Law Approach

    Meet the Owner

    I am personally committed to ensuring that each one of our clients receives the highest level of client service from our team.  Our mission is to provide excellent legal work in a cost-effective manner while maintaining open lines of communication between our clients and their attorneys.  Many of our clients are going through difficult times in their lives when they reach out to us.  They should feel comfortable leaning on the experience and knowledge of our attorneys as their counselors and advocates.  We are here to help!

    - Attorney Kevin O'Flaherty, Owner